|
Click on the pictures to see a
larger version of the image.


Links
The web sites and
pages listed below are excellent sources of information about the SV650:
www.sv650.org
www.svrider.com
www.suzukisv1000.com
Inside Bikes: SV650 review
Biker's Eye: SV650 review
Motorcycle
Online: SV650 review
Motorcyclist
Online: group test
Motorcycle
Daily: SV650 review
TWO magazine: SV650S review
A good user review here
This page features on

thebikereview.com
Motorcycle reviews forum & information.
...............................
Visit JHS Racing
 Dedicated, independent SV650
service, repair & motorcycle dyno engine tuning specialists.
...............................
RIP Hunter S Thompson 1937-2005 "On my tombstone they will carve: 'It never got fast enough for me'".
A unique & inspirational voice that will be sadly missed by me, for one. A link here to
Thompson's brilliant article for US Cycle World magazine 'Song of the sausage creature', a paen to the joy of motorcycle riding from the seat of a Ducati.
..............................
Performance figures
SV650 (unfaired) Top speed:
129mph Max. bhp: 67 0-60: no
figures, though lower geared, so probably slightly quicker than the S. |
SV650S (fairing) Top speed: 135mph
Max. bhp: 70 0-60: 4.1
seconds |
..............................
|
An owner’s perspective on Suzuki’s middleweight v-twin sports bike.
If you’re anything like me then you probably do a good deal of web-based research before you make a major purchase. When I decided in spring 2004 that I wanted to return to motorcycling after a break of some
12 years, inevitably I began searching the internet for information to help me decide what kind of bike would suit my purpose. And once I’d narrowed the field to include the Suzuki SV650S I found some very good pages out there covering these bikes – and I’ve linked to the best that I’ve found alongside.
Since purchasing my bike (second owner, 15k miles on the clock) I’ve become so
enamoured of it that I wanted to make my own contribution to the on-line pages in praise of the Suzuki SV650. Hence this page.
I'm not a professional reviewer, just an owner and rider, so I make no
claims for these opinions other than that they're based upon my experience.
I simply hope that my thoughts and observations might provide you with a little more information if you’re considering buying an SV650, just as the other pages that I’ve linked to here helped me in the decision to buy mine.
 |
It’s so pretty! My SV650S in its element at Cheddar Gorge – the best
opportunity for ‘canyon riding’ in south west England. |
A brief introduction to the bike. The Suzuki SV650 was first
released in 1999 and quickly developed a positive reputation. Eminently affordable, the bike offered a simple and effective package of
good looks and a
sweet engine combined with a frame of exceptional
handling characteristics. The SV soon earned the title of 'a great bike for the real world' from
various commentators, and became a recommended choice of transitional ride for those taking
a step up to larger machines (though some have argued that the SV650's
70 bhp could tempt an inexperienced and incautious rider into trouble,
or at least one who was coming straight from a learner 125). Suzuki have since sold many, many of these
motorcycles, in both the upright, flat-barred version and the sports S version. If you're looking for a middleweight road
bike there are a lot of very good reasons to consider the SV650.
Soul music
Every engine configuration has its own characteristics. With some configurations you are more aware of the engine – the way it sounds, the resonances that it transmits through the vehicle, the way that power is delivered. Among motorcycle engines the v-twin occupies its own special niche. The v-twin
makes a lot of sense from an engineering point of view – it’s compact and narrow for a start – but beyond this it has special, sensory qualities, a spirit of the machine that is expressed in its sound and the visceral feedback that it provides to the rider. And of course the v-twin has a noble lineage stretching back through motorcycling history – evoking such august marques as Harley, Indian, Vincent, Morini, Moto Guzzi and Ducati.
In fact, it is with that last marque – Ducati – that I think one can
most readily draw comparisons. It seems pretty clear to me that Suzuki took a lot of inspiration for the SV650, both mechanically and stylistically, from the Italian manufacturer
of zeitgeist-chart-topping objects of desire. The SV has been designed to
appeal to those people, like me, who adore Ducatis but can't countenance
the long term costs of owning one.
(For an interesting perspective on Ducati vs. Suzuki v-twin ownership, see this FAQ page on a Ducati
enthusiast's site. Even he recommends considering the SV650!).
A few years back I was lucky enough to ride a friend’s Ducati 748 for a couple of weeks while he was abroad (yep, I’d pinpoint
that as the moment when the v-twin bug first found its way into my system). And
whilst the Ducati is unquestionably the pedigree beast of the two, still,
in terms of riding experience, the SV stands a good deal of comparison with the Italian machine – not least in the particular
characteristics that result from mounting a punchy v-twin engine in a fine-handling frame.
I reckon the SV650’s engine sounds great. It has that distinctive v-twin timbre; a rich, sonorous quality under acceleration and
deceleration that, while not quite matching the sublime basso profundo of a Ducati, certainly sings from the same hymn sheet and deserves its place in the choir.
 |
The
styling of the original model is a design classic in my opinion. |
On the subject of
styling, for me the original (1999-2003) Suzuki SV650S is a design classic. There’s a fluid elegance to the
lines of the original SV, and especially the half-faired S model – to my mind it is a perfectly resolved form, a triumph of
graceful design that pleases the eye from almost every angle. Indeed, it was the love of this original styling that meant I had
no option but to buy a second-hand bike. Sadly, in my opinion, Suzuki’s restyling of the new-model SV has replaced the
original’s sensuous curves with an aggressive angularity that, while not unattractive, I personally felt was anodyne by
comparison with the earlier bikes. Of course the new model benefits from improvements such as fuel injection, is still
incredibly good value as a new bike, and will be just as much of a hoot to ride, but
it just didn't float my boat like the original.
I’ve always been of the opinion that understatement often makes the most powerful impact. The styling of the SV650S is a perfect
example of this. It’s striking, it has presence, and even when, as with mine, it is vibrantly yellow it’s not the least shouty or garish, it simply looks purposeful. People like the SV. People who don’t even like bikes are given to remarking about what a
nice looking bike it is. It has charm.
Riding the SV650S Let’s be clear, the SV650 is no screamer, not the fastest bike in the middleweight class by a long way, although no
slouch either. But now, with the experience of owning one, I firmly share the oft-expressed view that it’s a really great motorcycle.
It simply does what it does exceptionally well.
The SV is easy to ride in town, with plenty of manageable low-end response
and a smooth, light clutch (two useful characteristics that certainly
weren't a feature of the 748!). The bike feels nimble and narrow enough to
encourage threading it through traffic with confidence, and its comparatively
low seat height means an average height rider can easily get both feet down, which adds reassurance to low speed manoeuvring.
If the seat height is an issue for you, you can modify the rear suspension
linkage, dropping the seat by a further 25mm without any notable
degradation in handling.
However, while the SV650S is easy to ride in town, it’s not necessarily all that comfortable. As a sports bike, the ergonomics of the S – the clip-on bars and slightly pitched forward weight distribution – mean that even a
couple of miles of straight arm, on the brakes, town and slow traffic riding can put a lot of pressure on the palms of your hands; do enough of it and
your fingers can start getting numb.
And I'd only describe the saddle as just about adequately padded too. But get the bike moving along at a reasonable clip on a twisty road and the whole set-up makes perfect
sense, putting you in the most balanced posture for optimum control of the
bike. In fact, it's on sweeping fast A-roads and medium-speed, twisty Bs that the SV really shines; its outstanding, positive and confidence-inspiring handling making you want to really carve out smooth, clean arcs of road surfing on this machine.
As with riding any bike, in corners the SV responds best to carrying just the right amount of throttle into the curve, and then
using the v-twin’s great wedge of torque to scoop you out of the apex – an experience that is so rewarding that you instantly want to do it again. The SV engine produces so much grunt that it’ll pull smoothly in any of the middle ratios, and it
is this predictable, linear pick-up that makes this Suzuki such a joy to ride on a twisty road, without the need to endlessly swap through the gears to keep on the power. Under hard acceleration on a straight road the engine can appear to peak out earlier than you might expect (or at least to someone like me, having spent most of my formative motorcycling career on an assortment of
banzai two-stroke twins) so it feels that you’re called upon to keep snicking up through the gears to keep it charging. The effect is deceptive, because the SV is quicker than it seems, and
it'll scoot you up to way over the national limit so smoothly that you need to keep an eye on the speedo, especially in these times when it’s become so easy to fall foul of a mobile radar trap.
(Yes. Twice. On dual-carriageway in the middle of the countryside. Don't let me get started on the 'war on speeding' debate or
we'll be here forever...). That's the thing with the SV - while it may fall
short of the bhp or top speed figures of the other bikes in its class,
what it has is pitched exactly where you can use it best for life in the real world. Acceleration on this bike is all about
riding that mid-range v-twin torque rather than
hitting some peaky powerband. I've been surprised to discover that among its many fine
attributes the SV650 is a brilliant, stomping traffic-light dragster.
Once you've mastered slipping the clutch up into the engine's torque
sweet-spot, the SV (even the taller-geared S model) can really hustle 0-60;
and it does it with a smooth, booming dignity that means you just look
quick, rather than like someone trying too hard. I've found the SV can
decisively humble even powerful sports and muscle cars off the line, and
it's all over before they're able to press their more licence-threatening
top-end advantage.
Top tip: tyre pressures
One of the most useful handling tips that I’ve picked up so far regards tyre pressures. When I first got
my bike it was set up F33/R36 - which, it transpires, is the officially
recommended set-up. At the time I’d no idea if this was right, and had no
manual to refer to. Shortly afterwards I read a forum post in which an
Avon Tyres developer is quoted as saying that all manufacturers now work
to a standard of 36/42 for all middleweight road bikes, so I thought I'd
give this a try. I found that the SV does seem to respond positively to a
slight increase over the standard pressures. With the standard set-up I
was experiencing an unnerving 'tipping-in' sensation from the front in
slower turns, but a few extra psi tunes this out nicely. With some
experimentation I've now settled on 36/40 as optimal for my SV.
(Update note: these statements have proved
controversial. As with everything written here, this is simply an opinion
based on my experience of what works for me in the conditions
in which I ride, and I've yet to encounter any adverse effects from this
pressure set-up. I'm certainly not advocating that anyone ignores
any tyre manufacturer's specific advice, but you might find that a bit of
cautious experimentation yields some interesting results).
As to the matter of which are the best
replacement tyres to fit to the SV, you'll find extensive discussion on the
subject in the SV650.org forum (see 'links' alongside). The
standard Metzelers are quite adequate, but popular alternatives that
complement the bike and contribute to improved handling seem to be the
Pirelli Diablo and Bridgestone 020.
Suspension While these bikes handle brilliantly, the suspension,
particularly at the front, is one of the areas where economies were made
on this model. On the original SV there is little in the way of suspension
adjustment - none on the front, and only spring preload on the rear. Front
preload adjusters were added to the post-2002, re-styled models. The front
end had been one of the only disappointments about my bike - it would dive sharply under
braking, and even moderate bumps and potholes would provoke a loud clonk as
the tubes bottomed out (though on the positive side, this does teach you to
be smoother with the controls and steering to compensate for it). However, a recent full service that included fresh
fork oil has improved things significantly - this is clearly a maintenance
item that shouldn't be overlooked on these machines.
The bike feels fine on a motorway, easily powerful enough to plough through head and cross winds – and if you tuck down behind the fairing wind buffet is dramatically reduced, although I find this is an awkward posture to sustain for any great length of
time. But mostly when I get on a motorway I just find myself wondering why I didn’t take the winding route instead.
The brakes are certainly effective, though they need a progressive touch –
I soon noticed that it’s very easy to lock up the bike’s rear wheel in the
final moments of a hard stop. Again, learning to work within the limits of
the suspension is a factor here.
The SV’s stock exhaust system is okay, but I was intrigued to know how much better
it could sound, so after I’d had the bike a month I fitted a stainless steel Scorpion end can. Now the exhaust note is not so much louder but
gratifyingly ‘phatter’, and I’d say it has made the engine just a tad smoother and more responsive too. In my opinion it was £150 well spent. I’d been concerned that changing the exhaust might affect my insurance, but it transpires that with the – very reasonably priced –
Suzuki-specific insurance policy I have (Norwich Union, brokered by
Bennetts), exhaust replacement is permitted without penalty, as long as the after-market system’s value doesn’t exceed £300.
So, there it is. The SV650S - two thumbs
up.
© 2005 All written and photographic
material on this page is copyright David Harper and may only be reproduced
with permission.
contact: david.harper@westernaspect.com
Page last updated: 10/11/2005
Further reading can be found at my motorcycling blog: 'Rambling thoughts
of a UK biker' ...
|